First published 6 April 2010
One month ago I argued that there were certain instances where charity giving was both a way of disavowing the feeling of guilt, and that it operated like a business, trying to drive out other competition.
I argued that though this was the case, it is surely better to have charity for the many good things it has achieved, but that it must be remembered that certain wealthy individuals may use charity as a way of market dominance. (Continue)
Advertisement
